Early postoperative pulmonary complications after minimally invasive esophagectomy in the prone position: incidence and perioperative risk factors from the perspective of anesthetic management.

OBJECTIVES: To investigate the incidence of and the risk factors for early postoperative pulmonary complications (PPC) after minimally invasive esophagectomy (MIE) in the prone position from the perspective of anesthetic management. METHODS: We conducted a historical cohort study of patients who underwent MIE in the prone position between September 2010 and August 2018. PPC was defined as pneumonia, atelectasis, acute respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS), respiratory failure, and pulmonary embolism (Clavien-Dindo Classification Grade II or higher) that occurred within 7 days after MIE. RESULTS: Out of 489 patients, there were 90 patients (18.4%) with PPC: 75 patients with pneumonia, 24 patients with atelectasis, 13 patients with respiratory failure, 6 patients with ARDS, and 2 patients with pulmonary embolism. Twenty-eight patients suffered from 2 or more components of PPC. PPC patients were older (66.6 vs. 63.6 year, P = 0.038) and had higher amount of crystalloid (4200 vs. 3550 mL, P < 0.0001), and longer duration of anesthesia (670 vs. 625 min, P = 0.0062) than non-PPC patients. PPC patients were more likely to have had chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) (26.7 vs. 7.8%, P < 0.001). Incidence of PPC was significantly higher in patients with one-lung ventilation than with two-lung ventilation (37.1 vs. 15.3%, P < 0.001). Multivariable logistic regression analysis showed that PPC was associated with age (per 10 years, odds ratio (OR) = 1.41), COPD (OR = 3.43), one-lung ventilation (OR = 1.94), and volume of crystalloid (per 500 mL, OR = 1.22). CONCLUSIONS: Two-lung rather than one-lung ventilation should be chosen and fluid overload should be avoided in patients undergoing MIE in the prone position.

[A DRG/PPS simulation in the medical care of tuberculosis].

PURPOSE: To study the expected usefulness of the introduction of the DRG-PPS (Diagnosis-Related Group/Prospective Payment System, in which an insurer pays a fixed medical fee per hospitalization) into the current medical care of tuberculosis (TB) in Japan. METHOD: The medical fees were reviewed for all TB inpatients at 19 hospitals under the National Hospital Organization who were discharged in either June 2007 or February 2008. The sum of the fixed fee by the DRG was assumed based on the bivariate regression analysis of each patient's hospital days and his or her total actual fees during the hospital stay under the current (fee for care) system, since it was difficult to directly calculate the daily fees for every patient that would be the basis of DRG-PPS. RESULTS: Linear regression analysis estimated that the medical fees (including fees for the medical examinations and the treatments) for a hospital stay of 60 days, which is the standard for TB treatment, was 1,192,470 yen (19,870 yen per person per day) in June 2007, and 1,167,600 yen (19,460 yen per person per day) in February 2008. DISCUSSION: If we assume an average medical fee of about Y1.1-1.2 million yen for the standard hospital care of TB, the economic balance of the hospitals is negative, with a deficit of 0.6-0.7 million yen, given the estimated expenses of 1.8 million yen (i.e., 30,000 yen per person per day x 60 days). CONCLUSION: If the DRG-PPS is to be implemented based on the current medical fee rating system, the hospital administrators could not accept its introduction to the TB medical care service as it is, because it may undermine the economic management of hospitals.